Three models. Three codes. One honest scoreboard.

We run three different racing approaches across greyhound, horse and harness racing — and publish how every one of them actually performs.

Most tipping sites show you a single set of selections and quietly forget the misses. We do something different: we run three distinct models over every race, score each against the result, and show you the running record of all three. You decide which approach you trust.

How the three models cumulatively performed

Today Last 7 days All time

All codes combined

Model	Races	Strike	Flat ROI
Market Favourite The baseline — blindly backing the shortest-priced runner.	1,005	42.1%	-12.4%
Form Model Our pure form-and-speed model — no market influence.	1,005	42.9%	-8.6%
Market Blend The form model tempered by where the market sits.	1,005	42.6%	-10.2%
Consensus The form model combined with expert tip signals.	1,005	41.9%	-6.7%

Greyhound racing

Model	Races	Strike	Flat ROI
Market Favourite	663	45.6%	-9.0%
Form Model	663	46.6%	-3.6%
Market Blend	663	46.3%	-5.7%
Consensus	663	45.7%	-2.3%

Horse racing

Model	Races	Strike	Flat ROI
Market Favourite	191	35.6%	-11.0%
Form Model	191	36.1%	-9.5%
Market Blend	191	36.1%	-9.2%
Consensus	191	35.6%	-1.3%

Harness racing

Model	Races	Strike	Flat ROI
Market Favourite	151	35.1%	-29.1%
Form Model	151	35.1%	-29.0%
Market Blend	151	34.4%	-31.0%
Consensus	151	33.1%	-32.8%

Flat ROI = profit/loss per race to a level 1-unit win stake on each model's top pick, scored on settled results. Past performance is not a guide to future results.

The three approaches

Market Favourite The baseline — blindly backing the shortest-priced runner.

Form Model Our pure form-and-speed model — no market influence.

Market Blend The form model tempered by where the market sits.

Consensus The form model combined with expert tip signals.

Get the detailed cards

For full race-by-race ratings, head to the code site you follow:

Greyhound Tips → Horse Tips → Harness Tips →