Three models. Three codes. One honest scoreboard.

We run three different racing approaches across greyhound, horse and harness racing — and publish how every one of them actually performs.

Most tipping sites show you a single set of selections and quietly forget the misses. We do something different: we run three distinct models over every race, score each against the result, and show you the running record of all three. You decide which approach you trust.

How the three models cumulatively performed

Today Last 7 days All time

All codes combined

Model	Races	Strike	Flat ROI
Market Favourite The baseline — blindly backing the shortest-priced runner.	216	46.8%	-7.0%
Form Model Our pure form-and-speed model — no market influence.	216	45.4%	-7.4%
Market Blend The form model tempered by where the market sits.	216	47.7%	-0.6%
Consensus The form model combined with expert tip signals.	216	44.0%	-1.9%

Greyhound racing

Model	Races	Strike	Flat ROI
Market Favourite	157	48.4%	-7.5%
Form Model	157	46.5%	-9.2%
Market Blend	157	49.7%	+0.0%
Consensus	157	46.5%	+1.7%

Horse racing

Model	Races	Strike	Flat ROI
Market Favourite	33	33.3%	-21.8%
Form Model	33	39.4%	+2.1%
Market Blend	33	36.4%	-7.3%
Consensus	33	36.4%	+0.0%

Harness racing

Model	Races	Strike	Flat ROI
Market Favourite	26	53.8%	+14.9%
Form Model	26	46.2%	-9.0%
Market Blend	26	50.0%	+3.7%
Consensus	26	38.5%	-26.7%

Flat ROI = profit/loss per race to a level 1-unit win stake on each model's top pick, scored on settled results. Past performance is not a guide to future results.

The three approaches

Market Favourite The baseline — blindly backing the shortest-priced runner.

Form Model Our pure form-and-speed model — no market influence.

Market Blend The form model tempered by where the market sits.

Consensus The form model combined with expert tip signals.

Get the detailed cards

For full race-by-race ratings, head to the code site you follow:

Greyhound Tips → Horse Tips → Harness Tips →